The Implicit Association Test (IAT), first developed by
Greenwald and others (1998), tests our subconscious prejudices against
different groups of people. Sometimes we know our prejudices, sometimes its not
so obvious to us. I took two different IAT tests: one for age and one for race.
The IAT for race is a well known measure for implicit racism, which is racism
that runs unconsciously and without our awareness of it (Eberhardt et al.,
2006). It works by measuring how quickly participants pair African Americans
with negative and positive words compared with how quickly they make the same
associations with European Americans. I did not believe I would be high in
prejudice towards the elderly or African Americans, but surprisingly, both
tests showed I had a slight prejudice. The results were definitely inconsistent
with what I believed they would be.
The entire experience of taking the IAT was eye-opening.
Like most people, I like to think I don’t have any prejudices, but I guess they
are really unavoidable. I definitely don’t consciously change my behavior
towards the elderly or African Americans, the attitudes are subconscious. My
attitudes most likely stem from my upbringing (raised in a conservative family)
and all the cultural associations in the media that we see all the time. The
IAT probably is fairly accurate and reflects my true attitudes, no matter how
much I don’t want to believe it.
Completing the IAT made me realize how inescapable prejudice
can be sometimes. Even when you consciously think you hold no prejudices and
don’t want to be prejudiced, they still pop up. Since the attitudes are all
subconscious, it makes me wonder if I have ever subconsciously treated these
groups of people differently. Greenwald et al. (2009) found that white people
with implicit racism tend to have more negative nonverbal behaviors in
interracial interactions (physical distance or no eye contact). I would never
consciously behave differently towards people just because they are older or
African American, so I was astonished to get these results. Taking these IAT’s
was extremely eye-opening and an interesting experience!
References:
Eberhardt, J. L.,
Davies, P. G., Purdier-Vaughns, V. J., & Johnson, S. L. (2006). Looking
deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of black defendants predicts
capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological
Science, 17, 383-386.
Greenwald, A. G.,
McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual
differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
Greenwald, A. G.,
Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and
using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta- Analysis of predictive
validity. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 97, 17- 41.
Word Count: 352
No comments:
Post a Comment